The Ethics of Information: Absolute Risk Reduction and Patient Understanding of Screening

Journal of General Internal Medicine 23 (6):867-870 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some experts have argued that patients should routinely be told the specific magnitude and absolute probability of potential risks and benefits of screening tests. This position is motivated by the idea that framing risk information in ways that are less precise violates the ethical principle of respect for autonomy and its application in informed consent or shared decisionmaking. In this Perspective, we consider a number of problems with this view that have not been adequately addressed. The most important challenges stem from the danger that patients will misunderstand the information or have irrational responses to it. Any initiative in this area should take such factors into account and should consider carefully how to apply the ethical principles of respect for autonomy and beneficence.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SCHTEO-132
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-07-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-07-14

Total views
281 ( #22,820 of 2,448,408 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #36,913 of 2,448,408 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.