The Ethics of Information: Absolute Risk Reduction and Patient Understanding of Screening

Journal of General Internal Medicine 23 (6):867-870 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some experts have argued that patients should routinely be told the specific magnitude and absolute probability of potential risks and benefits of screening tests. This position is motivated by the idea that framing risk information in ways that are less precise violates the ethical principle of respect for autonomy and its application in informed consent or shared decisionmaking. In this Perspective, we consider a number of problems with this view that have not been adequately addressed. The most important challenges stem from the danger that patients will misunderstand the information or have irrational responses to it. Any initiative in this area should take such factors into account and should consider carefully how to apply the ethical principles of respect for autonomy and beneficence.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SCHTEO-132
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-07-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A History and Theory of Informed Consent.Faden, Ruth R. & Beauchamp, Tom L.
A Systematic Review on Communicating with Patients About Evidence.Trevena, Lyndal J.; Barratt, Alexandra; Butow, Phyllis & Caldwell, Patrina

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Medical Nihilism.Stegenga, Jacob
Giving Patients Granular Control of Personal Health Information: Using an Ethics ‘Points to Consider’ to Inform Informatics System Designers.Meslin, Eric M.; Alpert, Sheri A.; Carroll, Aaron E.; Odell, Jere D.; Tierney, William M. & Schwartz, Peter H.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-07-14

Total views
182 ( #19,091 of 43,984 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #8,376 of 43,984 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.