The Obligation to Participate in Biomedical Research

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The current prevailing view is that participation in biomedical research is above and beyond the call of duty. While some commentators have offered reasons against this, we propose a novel public goods argument for an obligation to participate in biomedical research. Biomedical knowledge is a public good, available to any individual even if that individual does not contribute to it. Participation in research is a critical way to support an important public good. Consequently, all have a duty to participate. The current social norm is that individuals participate only if they have a good reason to do so. The public goods argument implies that individuals should participate unless they have a good reason not to. Such a shift would be of great aid to the progress of biomedical research, eventually making society significantly healthier and longer lived.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SCHTOT-29
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
An Ethics Framework for a Learning Health Care System: A Departure From Traditional Research Ethics and Clinical Ethics.Faden, Ruth R.; Kass, Nancy E.; Goodman, Steven N.; Pronovost, Peter; Tunis, Sean & Beauchamp, Tom L.
Can RESEARCH and CARE Be Ethically Integrated?Largent, Emily A.; Joffe, Steven & Miller, Franklin G.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-10-23

Total views
56 ( #30,230 of 39,912 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #19,259 of 39,912 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.