Does Scientific Progress Consist in Increasing Knowledge or Understanding?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Bird argues that scientific progress consists in increasing knowledge. Dellsén objects that increasing knowledge is neither necessary nor sufficient for scientific progress, and argues that scientific progress rather consists in increasing understanding. Dellsén also contends that unlike Bird’s view, his view can account for the scientific practices of using idealizations and of choosing simple theories over complex ones. I argue that Dellsén’s criticisms against Bird’s view fail, and that increasing understanding cannot account for scientific progress, if acceptance, as opposed to belief, is required for scientific understanding.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SEUDSP
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-04-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-04-19

Total views
374 ( #14,475 of 57,027 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
74 ( #8,910 of 57,027 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.