Does Scientific Progress Consist in Increasing Knowledge or Understanding?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Bird argues that scientific progress consists in increasing knowledge. Dellsén objects that increasing knowledge is neither necessary nor sufficient for scientific progress, and argues that scientific progress rather consists in increasing understanding. Dellsén also contends that unlike Bird’s view, his view can account for the scientific practices of using idealizations and of choosing simple theories over complex ones. I argue that Dellsén’s criticisms against Bird’s view fail, and that increasing understanding cannot account for scientific progress, if acceptance, as opposed to belief, is required for scientific understanding.
Categories
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SEUDSP
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-04-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-04-19

Total views
281 ( #15,934 of 50,101 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #9,853 of 50,101 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.