On Treating Past and Present Scientific Theories Differently

Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):63-76 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Scientific realists argue that present theories are more successful than past theories, so present theories will not be superseded by alternatives, even though past theories were superseded by alternatives. Alai (2016) objects that although present theories are more successful than past theories, they will be replaced by future theories, just as past theories were replaced by present theories. He contends, however, that past theories were partly true, and that present theories are largely true. I argue that Alai’s discrimination between past and present theories is subject to his own criticism against realists’ discriminations between past and present theories, and also subject to other criticisms that philosophers have raised against scientific realism and pessimism.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SEUOTP
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-04-12
Latest version: 2 (2017-04-12)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Treatise of Human Nature.Hume, David & Lindsay, A. D.
A Treatise of Human Nature.Hume, David & Lindsay, A. D.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-04-12

Total views
85 ( #27,963 of 42,225 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #38,284 of 42,225 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.