Beyond Mendelism and Biometry

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):155-163 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Historiographical analyses of the development of genetics in the first decade of the 20th century have been to a great extent framed in the context of the Mendelian-Biometrician controversy. Much has been discussed on the nature, origin, development, and legacy of the controversy. However, such a framework is becoming less useful and fruitful. This paper challenges the traditional historiography framed by the Mendelian-Biometrician distinction. It argues that the Mendelian-Biometrician distinction fails to reflect the theoretical and methodological diversity in the controversy. It also argues that that the Mendelian-Biometrician distinction is not helpful to make a full understanding of the development of genetics in the first decade of the twentieth century.

Author's Profile

Yafeng Shan
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-16

Downloads
515 (#32,745)

6 months
163 (#19,445)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?