Defending Davidson’s Anti-skepticism Argument: A Reply to Otavio Bueno

Philosophy Study 7 (11) (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In the article of Bueno titled “Davidson and Skepticism: How Not to Respond to the Skeptic,” he intends to demonstrate that although Davidson’s theory of Coherence holds many attractions, it does not entail a response to any kinds of skepticism including Global, Lottery, and Pyrrhonian. In this study, the goal is to criticize the work of Prof. Bueno in connection with two criticisms raised by him over Davidson’s anti-skeptical strategy. Further, by giving some reasons in favor of Davidson’s anti-skepticism argument, it will be shown that neither the above stated criticisms nor the global skepticism response could undermine the validity of anti-skepticism argument.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SHADDA-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-01-24
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-01-12

Total views
187 ( #23,217 of 51,565 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #16,627 of 51,565 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.