Defending Davidson’s Anti-skepticism Argument: A Reply to Otavio Bueno

Philosophy Study 7 (11) (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In the article of Bueno titled “Davidson and Skepticism: How Not to Respond to the Skeptic,” he intends to demonstrate that although Davidson’s theory of Coherence holds many attractions, it does not entail a response to any kinds of skepticism including Global, Lottery, and Pyrrhonian. In this study, the goal is to criticize the work of Prof. Bueno in connection with two criticisms raised by him over Davidson’s anti-skeptical strategy. Further, by giving some reasons in favor of Davidson’s anti-skepticism argument, it will be shown that neither the above stated criticisms nor the global skepticism response could undermine the validity of anti-skepticism argument.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SHADDA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-01-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-01-12

Total views
103 ( #24,292 of 40,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #14,755 of 40,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.