You Can't Choose Your Family: Impartial Morality and Personal Obligations in Alias

In Patricia Brace & Robert Arp (eds.), The Philosophy of J.J. Abrams. The University Press of Kentucky. pp. 173-189 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this essay, I critically examine the ways in which the characters of Alias attempt to balance their impartial moral obligations (e.g. duties toward humanity) and their personal obligations (e.g. duties toward one's children). I specifically examine three areas of conflict: (1) choices between saving loved ones and maximizing consequences, (2) choices to maintain or sever relationships with characters who are vicious or immoral, and (3) choices to seek or not seek revenge on the behalf of loved ones. I conclude that Sydney's and Jack's moral choices show that one can and should privilege loved ones to some extent, but that this privilege has limits.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-12-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Utilitarianism.Mill, John Stuart
.Railton, Peter

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
72 ( #37,877 of 50,268 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #45,459 of 50,268 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.