Phenomenologism vs fundamentalism: The case of superconductivity

CURRENT SCIENCE, 94 (10):1256-1264 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This article argues that phenomenological treatment of physical problems is more powerful than fundamental treatment. Developments in the field of superconductivity present us with a clear example of such superiority. The BCS (Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer) was accepted as the fundamental theory of superconductivity for a long time. Nevertheless, Landau and Ginzburg phenomenological model has so far proven to be a more fruitful theoretical representation to understand and to predict the features of superconductivity and superconductive materials.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-09-12
Latest version: 1 (2016-09-12)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
138 ( #32,287 of 55,928 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #47,877 of 55,928 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.