Puzzles for Recursive Reliabilism
Review of Analytic Philosophy 2 (1):55-73 (2022)
Abstract
The recursive aspect of process reliabilism has rarely been examined. The regress puzzle, which illustrates infinite regress arising from the combination of the recursive structure and the no-defeater condition incorporated into it, is a valuable exception. However, this puzzle can be dealt with in the framework of process reliabilism by reconsidering the relationship between the recursion and the no-defeater condition based on the distinction between prima facie and ultima facie justification. Thus, the regress puzzle is not a basis for abandoning process reliabilism. A genuinely intractable problem for recursive reliabilism lies in the gap between the reliability of the entire path to a belief and that of its parts. Confronted with this puzzle, reliabilists can orient themselves toward ‘reliable-as-a-whole reliabilism’ instead of ‘reliable-in-every-part reliabilism’, including recursive reliabilism, which is found to be not well-motivated.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SHUPFR
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-08-03
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-08-03
Total views
18 ( #70,944 of 71,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #42,085 of 71,180 )
2022-08-03
Total views
18 ( #70,944 of 71,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #42,085 of 71,180 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.