Puzzles for Recursive Reliabilism

Review of Analytic Philosophy 2 (1):55-73 (2022)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The recursive aspect of process reliabilism has rarely been examined. The regress puzzle, which illustrates infinite regress arising from the combination of the recursive structure and the no-defeater condition incorporated into it, is a valuable exception. However, this puzzle can be dealt with in the framework of process reliabilism by reconsidering the relationship between the recursion and the no-defeater condition based on the distinction between prima facie and ultima facie justification. Thus, the regress puzzle is not a basis for abandoning process reliabilism. A genuinely intractable problem for recursive reliabilism lies in the gap between the reliability of the entire path to a belief and that of its parts. Confronted with this puzzle, reliabilists can orient themselves toward ‘reliable-as-a-whole reliabilism’ instead of ‘reliable-in-every-part reliabilism’, including recursive reliabilism, which is found to be not well-motivated.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SHUPFR
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-08-03
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-08-03

Total views
18 ( #70,944 of 71,180 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #42,085 of 71,180 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.