Ordinary Objects and Series‐Style Answers to the Special Composition Question

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (1):69-88 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The special composition question asks, roughly, under what conditions composition occurs. The common sense view is that composition only occurs among some things and that all and only ‘ordinary objects’ exist. Peter van Inwagen has marshaled a devastating argument against this view. The common sense view appears to commit one to giving what van Inwagen calls a ‘series-style answer’ to the special composition question, but van Inwagen argues that series-style answers are impossible because they are inconsistent with the transitivity of parthood. In what follows I answer this objection in addition to other, less troubling objections raised by van Inwagen.
Categories
Reprint years
2013
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SILOOA
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2018-05-31)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
The Structure of Objects.Koslicki, Kathrin
Material Beings.VAN INWAGEN, Peter
Brutal Composition.Markosian, Ned
Ordinary Objects.Thomasson, Amie (ed.)

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Composition.Korman, Daniel Z. & Carmichael, Chad
Ordinary Objects.Korman, Daniel Z.
Physical Composition by Bonding.Husmann, Julian & Näger, Paul M.
Richard Rorty and Epistemic Normativity.Kerr, Eric T. & Carter, J. Adam

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-05-29

Total views
1,363 ( #1,223 of 41,495 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #13,758 of 41,495 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.