The Logical Web

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Different logic systems are motivated by attempts to fix the counter-intuitive instances of classical argumentative forms, e.g., strengthening of the antecedent, contraposition and conditional negation. These counter-examples are regarded as evidence that classical logic should be rejected in favour of a new logic system in which these argumentative forms are considered invalid. It is argued that these logical revisions are ad hoc, because those controversial argumentative forms are implied by other argumentative forms we want to keep. It is impossible to remove an argumentative form from a logical system without getting entangled in an intricate logical web, since these revisions imply the removal of other parts of a system we want to maintain. Consequently, these revisions are incoherent and unwarranted. At the very least, the usual approach in the analysis of counter-examples of argumentative forms must be seriously reconsidered.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SILTLW
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-01-30
Latest version: 15 (2022-06-23)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-01-30

Total views
141 ( #43,674 of 70,017 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #25,293 of 70,017 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.