Weak and Strong Necessity Modals: On Linguistic Means of Expressing "A Primitive Concept OUGHT"

In Meaning, Decision, and Norms: Themes from the Work of Allan Gibbard (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper develops an account of the meaning of `ought', and the distinction between weak necessity modals (`ought', `should') and strong necessity modals (`must', `have to'). I argue that there is nothing specially ``strong'' about strong necessity modals per se: uses of `Must p' predicate the (deontic/epistemic/etc.) necessity of the prejacent p of the actual world (evaluation world). The apparent ``weakness'' of weak necessity modals derives from their bracketing whether the necessity of the prejacent is verified in the actual world. `Ought p' can be accepted without needing to settle that the relevant considerations (norms, expectations, etc.) that actually apply verify the necessity of p. I call the basic account a modal-past approach to the weak/strong necessity modal distinction (for reasons that become evident). Several ways of implementing the approach in the formal semantics/pragmatics are critically examined. The account systematizes a wide range of linguistic phenomena: it generalizes across flavors of modality; it elucidates a special role that weak necessity modals play in discourse and planning; it captures contrasting logical, expressive, and illocutionary properties of weak and strong necessity modals; and it sheds light on how a notion of `ought' is often expressed in other languages. These phenomena have resisted systematic explanation. In closing I briefly consider how linguistic inquiry into differences among necessity modals may improve theorizing on broader philosophical issues.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SILWAS
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-01-20
Latest version: 2 (2020-04-23)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Counterfactuals.Lewis, David K.
Thinking How to Live.Gibbard, Allan
Impassioned Belief.Ridge, Michael

View all 87 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Practical Moore Sentences.Mandelkern, Matthew

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-01-20

Total views
221 ( #19,771 of 50,020 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #15,228 of 50,020 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.