Some Moral Critique of Theodicy is Misplaced, But Not All

Religious Studies 45 (3):339-346 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Several recent critiques of theodicy have incorporated some form of moral objection to the theodical enterprise, in which the critic argues that one ought not to engage in the practice of theodicy. In defending theodical practice against the moral critique, Atle O. Søvik argues that the moral critique (1) begs the question against theodicy, and (2) misapprehends the implications of the claim that it is inappropriate to espouse a theodicy in certain situations. In this paper I suggest some sympathetic emendations for Søvik's theodical apologetic, but I argue against Søvik's claim that the moral critique of theodicy is altogether irrelevant
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SIMSMC
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-03-04
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-07-28

Total views
116 ( #41,730 of 2,449,102 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #53,121 of 2,449,102 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.