One‐Person Moral Twin Earth Cases

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):16-22 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents two cases demonstrating that theories allowing the environment to partially determine the content of moral concepts provide incorrect truth-conditions for moral terms. While typical Moral Twin Earth cases seek to establish that these theories fail to account formoral disagreement, neither case here essentially involves interpersonal disagreement. Both involve a single person retaining moral beliefs despite recognizing actual or potential mismatches with the purportedly content-determining facts. This lets opponents of such theories grant objections that standard Moral Twin Earth cases fail to demonstrate disagreement, and argue more straightforwardly that they generate implausible truth-conditions for moral claims.

Author's Profile

Neil Sinhababu
National University of Singapore

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-20

Downloads
942 (#14,380)

6 months
126 (#30,891)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?