Rational epistemic akrasia for the ambivalent pragmatist

In Dimitria Electra Gatzia & Berit Brogaard (eds.), Being of Two Minds: The Philosophy and Psychology of Ambivalence (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Epistemic akrasia can be rational. I consider a lonely pragmatist who believes that her imaginary friend doesn’t exist, and also believes on pragmatic grounds that she should believe in him. She rationally believes that her imaginary friend doesn’t exist, rationally follows various sources of evidence to the view that she should believe in him to end her loneliness, and rationally holds these attitudes simultaneously. Evidentialism suggests that her ambivalent epistemic state is rational, as considerations grounded in the value of truth justify her beliefs.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-02-08
Latest version: 2 (2021-02-08)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
372 ( #18,082 of 64,215 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
86 ( #7,427 of 64,215 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.