Scalar consequentialism the right way

Philosophical Studies 175 (12):3131-3144 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The rightness and wrongness of actions fits on a continuous scale. This fits the way we evaluate actions chosen among a diverse range of options, even though English speakers don’t use the words “righter” and “wronger”. I outline and defend a version of scalar consequentialism, according to which rightness is a matter of degree, determined by how good the consequences are. Linguistic resources are available to let us truly describe actions simply as right. Some deontological theories face problems in accounting for degrees of rightness, as they don't invoke continuous parameters among the right-making features of action.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-09-28
Latest version: 3 (2021-10-15)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
11,992 ( #117 of 64,138 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
207 ( #2,361 of 64,138 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.