Consistent Vegetarianism and the Suffering of Wild Animals

Journal of Practical Ethics 4 (2):94-102 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Ethical consequentialist vegetarians believe that farmed animals have lives that are worse than non-existence. In this paper, I sketch out an argument that wild animals have worse lives than farmed animals, and that consistent vegetarians should therefore reduce the number of wild animals as a top priority. I consider objections to the argument, and discuss which courses of action are open to those who accept the argument.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SITCVA
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Animal Consciousness.Allen, Colin & Trestman, Michael
Policing Nature.Cowen, Tyler

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Moral Vegetarianism.Doggett, Tyler

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-01-09

Total views
97 ( #28,734 of 44,347 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #21,722 of 44,347 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.