Blur and interoceptive vision

Philosophical Studies 178 (10):3271-3289 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The paper presents a new philosophical theory of blurred vision according to which visual experiences have two types of content: exteroceptive content, characterizing external entities, and interoceptive content, characterizing the state of the visual system. In particular, it is claimed that blurriness-related phenomenology interoceptively presents acuity of vision in relation to eye focus. The proposed theory is consistent with the representationalist thesis that phenomenal character supervenes on representational content and with the strong transparency thesis formulated in terms of mind-independentness. Furthermore, the interoceptive approach is free from controversial assumptions adopted by other philosophical theories of blurred experiences and is able to account for the epistemic and motivational role of visual blur, i.e. that blurred experiences provide a prima facie justification for beliefs regarding our vision and motivate actions directed toward our eyes.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-12
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
114 ( #44,268 of 65,514 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #25,433 of 65,514 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.