Denialism as Applied Skepticism: Philosophical and Empirical Considerations

Erkenntnis:1-20 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The scientific community, we hold, often provides society with knowledge—that the HIV virus causes AIDS, that anthropogenic climate change is underway, that the MMR vaccine is safe. Some deny that we have this knowledge, however, and work to undermine it in others. It has been common to refer to such agents as “denialists”. At first glance, then, denialism appears to be a form of skepticism. But while we know that various denialist strategies for suppressing belief are generally effective, little is known about which strategies are most effective. We see this as an important first step toward their remediation. This paper leverages the approximate comparison to various forms of philosophical skepticism to design an experimental test of the efficacy of four broad strategies of denial at suppressing belief in specific scientific claims. Our results suggest that assertive strategies are more effective at suppressing belief than questioning strategies.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SLADAA
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-01-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-08-21

Total views
21 ( #33,800 of 37,195 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #17,784 of 37,195 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.