Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Elements in Hume

Journal of Scottish Philosophy 14 (3):275-296 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
For the last forty years, Hume's Newtonianism has been a debated topic in Hume scholarship. The crux of the matter can be formulated by the following question: Is Hume a Newtonian philosopher? Debates concerning this question have produced two lines of interpretation. I shall call them ‘traditional’ and ‘critical’ interpretations. The traditional interpretation asserts that there are many Newtonian elements in Hume, whereas the critical interpretation seriously questions this. In this article, I consider the main points made by both lines of interpretations and offer further arguments that contribute to this debate. I shall first argue, in favor of the traditional interpretation, that Hume is sympathetic to many prominently Newtonian themes in natural philosophy such as experimentalism, criticality of hypotheses, inductive proof, and criticality of Leibnizian principles of sufficient reason and intelligibility. Second, I shall argue, in accordance with the critical interpretation, that in many cases Hume...
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SLANAN
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-09-08
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-09-05

Total views
126 ( #40,959 of 64,124 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #47,845 of 64,124 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.