Descartes' Forgotten Hypotheses on Motion

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This essay explores two of the more neglected hypotheses that comprise, or supplement, Descartes’ relationalist doctrine of bodily motion. These criteria are of great importance, for they would appear to challenge Descartes’ principal judgment that motion is a purely reciprocal change of a body’s contiguous neighborhood. After critiquing the work of the few commentators who have previously examined these forgotten hypotheses, mainly, D. Garber and M. Gueroult, the overall strengths and weaknesses of Descartes’ supplementary criteria will be assessed. Overall, despite their ingenuity, it will be demonstrated that Descartes’ criteria cannot rescue his brand of natural laws from the inherent limitations of his strong relational account of motion.
Keywords
ISBN(s)
1053-8364
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SLODFH
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-05-22
Latest version: 2 (2020-05-22)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-12-02

Total views
84 ( #39,518 of 54,545 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #22,010 of 54,545 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.