Classical Logic and Neutrosophic Logic. Answers to K. Georgiev

Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 13:79-83 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, we make distinctions between Classical Logic (where the propositions are 100% true, or 100 false) and the Neutrosophic Logic (where one deals with partially true, partially indeterminate and partially false propositions) in order to respond to K. Georgiev’s criticism [1]. We recall that if an axiom is true in a classical logic system, it is not necessarily that the axiom be valid in a modern (fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, neutrosophic etc.) logic system.

Author's Profile

Florentin Smarandache
University of New Mexico


Added to PP

36 (#83,144)

6 months
22 (#76,753)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?