‘Identity’ as a mereological term

Synthese 194 (7):2367-2385 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The mereological predicate ‘is part of’ can be used to define the predicate ‘is identical with’. I argue that this entails that mereological theories can be ideologically simpler than nihilistic theories that do not use the notion of parthood—contrary to what has been argued by Ted Sider. Moreover, if one accepts an extensional mereology, there are good philosophical reasons apart from ideological simplicity to give a mereological definition of identity
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMIIAA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-03-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mereology.Varzi, Achille C.
Against Parthood.Sider, Theodore

View all 45 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-03-02

Total views
478 ( #8,665 of 50,241 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
91 ( #5,548 of 50,241 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.