Measuring the Consequences of Rules: Holly M. Smith

Utilitas 22 (4):413-433 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recently two distinct forms of rule-utilitarianism have been introduced that differ on how to measure the consequences of rules. Brad Hooker advocates fixed-rate rule-utilitarianism, while Michael Ridge advocates variable-rate rule-utilitarianism. I argue that both of these are inferior to a new proposal, optimum-rate rule-utilitarianism. According to optimum-rate rule-utilitarianism, an ideal code is the code whose optimum acceptance level is no lower than that of any alternative code. I then argue that all three forms of rule-utilitarianism fall prey to two fatal problems that leave us without any viable form of rule-utilitarianism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMIMTC-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
439 ( #11,078 of 54,449 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
80 ( #7,349 of 54,449 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.