Measuring the Consequences of Rules: Holly M. Smith

Utilitas 22 (4):413-433 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently two distinct forms of rule-utilitarianism have been introduced that differ on how to measure the consequences of rules. Brad Hooker advocates fixed-rate rule-utilitarianism, while Michael Ridge advocates variable-rate rule-utilitarianism. I argue that both of these are inferior to a new proposal, optimum-rate rule-utilitarianism. According to optimum-rate rule-utilitarianism, an ideal code is the code whose optimum acceptance level is no lower than that of any alternative code. I then argue that all three forms of rule-utilitarianism fall prey to two fatal problems that leave us without any viable form of rule-utilitarianism.

Author's Profile

Holly Smith
Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
820 (#17,565)

6 months
144 (#23,987)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?