On the unreliability of introspection

Philosophical Studies 165 (3):1177-1186 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In his provocative and engaging new book, Perplexities of Consciousness, Eric Schwitzgebel makes a compelling case that introspection is unreliable in the sense that we are prone to ignorance and error in making introspective judgments about our own conscious experience. My aim in this commentary is to argue that Schwitzgebel’s thesis about the unreliability of introspection does not have the damaging implications that he claims it does for the prospects of a broadly Cartesian approach to epistemology
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Introspection and Consciousness.Smithies, Declan & Stoljar, Daniel (eds.)

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
891 ( #3,536 of 50,081 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
116 ( #4,115 of 50,081 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.