suggestions and Challenges for a Social Account of Sensitivity

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I put the claim that sensitivity is a necessary condition for knowledge under pressure, by considering its applicability with regard to testimonially-formed beliefs. Building on, and departing from, Goldberg, I positively draw out how we might understand the required sensitivity as a social interaction between speaker and hearer in testimonial cases. In doing so however, I identify a concern which places the whole notion of testimonial sensitivity in potential jeopardy: the problem of the reliable liar. I find an apparently paradoxical inverse relationship between better-differentiating methods that fulfil sensitivity conditions, and being able to have sensitive beliefs with regard to specific instances of testimony. After examining potential resolutions, I conclude that only a focus on minimally realising the problem, rather than “solving” it, will enable us to retain sensitivity as a necessary condition for testimonial-knowledge.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMISAC-7
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-04-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Against Gullibility.Fricker, Elizabeth
Unsafe Knowledge.Comesaña, Juan

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2020-04-17

Total views
15 ( #49,983 of 50,187 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #33,995 of 50,187 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.