The Curious Case of Ronald McDonald’s Claim to Rights: An Ontological Account of Differences in Group and Individual Person Rights: Winner of the 2016 Essay Competition of the International Social Ontology Society

Journal of Social Ontology 4 (1):1-28 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Performative accounts of personhood argue that group agents are persons, fit to be held responsible within the social sphere. Nonetheless, these accounts want to retain a moral distinction between group and individual persons. That: Group-persons can be responsible for their actions qua persons, but that group-persons might nonetheless not have rights equivalent to those of human persons. I present an argument which makes sense of this disanalogy, without recourse to normative claims or additional ontological commitments. I instead ground rights in the different relations in which performative persons stand in relation to one another.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMITCC-24
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Positional Goods and Upstream Agency.Halliday, Daniel & Hankins, Keith

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-03-02

Total views
26 ( #37,136 of 40,765 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #35,335 of 40,765 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.