The Ontological Argument: Past, Present, and Future?

Sententias (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article serves to explore the historical development of the ontological argument from Anselm to Present. Initially, the main goal is to introduce the lay reader to one of the most perplexing arguments for the theistic conception of God. Logically, this is an a priori argument, similar to one of a mathematical proof. Oddly, the argument has sort of fallen out of place in contemporary philosophy, apart from a reboot from Alvin Plantinga. The goal is to illustrate that the initial argument as stated by Anselm seems to be an unsolved problem in philosophical inquiry.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMITOA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-05-31

Total views
181 ( #14,639 of 38,072 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #23,413 of 38,072 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.