Contrastive Semantics for Deontic Modals

In Martijn Blaauw (ed.), Contrastivism in Philosophy: New Perspectives. Routledge (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper argues for contrastivism about the deontic modals, 'ought', 'must', and 'may'. A simple contrastivist semantics that predicts the desired entailment relations among these modals is offered.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-04-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Elusive Knowledge.Lewis, David K.
Moral Skepticisms.Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter
Knowing the Answer.Schaffer, Jonathan

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
One Ought Too Many.Finlay, Stephen & Snedegar, Justin

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
86 ( #27,147 of 41,573 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #32,268 of 41,573 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.