Sexual use and what to do about it : internalist and externalist sexual ethics

In Adrianne Leigh McEvoy (ed.), Essays in Philosophy. Rodopi. pp. 2 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I begin by describing the hideous nature of sexuality, that which makes sexual desire and activity morally suspicious, or at least what we have been told about the moral foulness of sex by, in particular, Immanuel Kant, but also by some of his predecessors and by some contemporary philosophers.2 A problem arises because acting on sexual desire, given this Kantian account of sex, apparently conflicts with the Categorical Imperative. I then propose a typology of possible solutions to this sex problem and critically discuss recent philosophical ethics of sex that fall into the typology's various categories
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SOBSUA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Sexual Perversion.Nagel, Thomas

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-10-25

Total views
1,479 ( #1,145 of 42,375 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #8,579 of 42,375 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.