Phenomenology of Radical Temporality- Heidegger, Derrida, Husserl and Gendlin

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Welcome to my philosophy page. In recent years , a community of interlinked approaches in philosophy and psychology has emerged, known by such labels as situated cognition, constructivism, 4EA (Embodied, Embedded, Enactive, Extended, and Affective) and corporeal intersubjectivity. Representatives of these overlapping approaches such as Francisco Varela (autopoietic self-organizing systems), Shaun Gallagher, Evan Thompson, Matthew Ratcliffe, Maxine Sheets-Johnstone, Dan Zahavi, Hanne De Jaegher, Alva Noe and Thomas Fuchs(enactive, embodied('4EA') cognition), John Protevi(Deleuzian biopolitics) and Jan Slaby (critical neuroscience) purport to have assimilated the central phenomenological insights of Martin Heidegger, Edmund Husserl and Eugene Gendlin concerning such matters as the nature of affectivity, intersubjectivity and temporality. I argue in the following papers, however, that Derrida, Heidegger, Husserl, Gendlin and George Kelly interpret the concept of temporality in a radical manner that embodied enactivist writers like Gallagher, Zahavi, Ratcliffe, Thompson and Fuchs fail to take into account in their readings of phenomenology. As a result , the latter's accounts of affectivity, intentionality and intersubjectivity remain burdened by traditional presuppositions that the radically temporal phenomenologies of Heidegger, Gendlin et al put into question.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-07-25
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #49,474 of 53,007 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #21,688 of 53,007 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.