Hamlet and the Time of Action

In Roman Altshuler & Michael J. Sigrist (eds.), Time and the Philosophy of Action. London: Routledge. pp. 272-283 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter I want to explore a comment made by the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze that presents a connection between two figures: Kant and Hamlet.1 In his most important early work, Difference and Repetition, Deleuze writes, “the Northern Prince says ‘time is out of joint’. Can it be that the Northern philosopher says the same thing?” (Deleuze 2004, 111). In this chapter, I want to look at the question of drama and see how different conceptions of drama allow us to understand action, or more precisely inaction, in Shakespeare’s Hamlet. I want to show how these different conceptions of dramatic action tell us something about the nature of temporality. I will begin by reversing Hamlet’s claim, and discussing what time “in joint” would look like, tracing it back to Aristotle’s conception of drama, before moving on to Plato’s characterization of temporality.

Author's Profile

Henry Somers-Hall
Royal Holloway University of London

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-16

Downloads
138 (#81,746)

6 months
88 (#50,911)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?