On the explanatory demands of the Special Composition Question

Synthese:1-14 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The Special Composition Question may be formulated as follows: for any xs whatsoever, what are the metaphysically necessary and jointly sufficient conditions in virtue of which there is a y such that those xs compose y? But what is the scope of the sought after explanation? Should an answer merely explain compositional facts, or should it explain certain ontological facts as well? On one natural reading, the question seeks an explanation of both the compositional facts and the ontological; the question seeks to explain how composite objects exist; how there is a y such that the xs compose y. But it turns out that some answers to the Special Composition Question presuppose those ontological facts rather than explain those ontological facts. In this paper, I will indicate what I take to be the different explanatory demands met by the representative answers. I will argue that the wide scope explanatory demands can’t be satisfied. I will also show that this result has bearing on the current debate about composition.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SPEOTE
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-03-04
Latest version: 2 (2019-03-04)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-03-01

Total views
225 ( #21,418 of 53,644 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #14,830 of 53,644 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.