The problem of empty names and Russellian Plenitude

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):1-18 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘Ahab is a whaler’ and ‘Holmes is a whaler’ express different propositions, even though neither ‘Ahab’ nor ‘Holmes’ has a referent. This seems to constitute a theoretical puzzle for the Russellian view of propositions. In this paper, I develop a variant of the Russellian view, Plenitudinous Russellianism. I claim that ‘Ahab is a whaler’ and ‘Holmes is a whaler’ express distinct gappy propositions. I discuss key metaphysical and semantic differences between Plenitudinous Russellianism and Traditional Russellianism and respond to objections that stem from those differences.

Author's Profile

Joshua Spencer
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-18

Downloads
458 (#31,382)

6 months
122 (#23,573)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?