The Evidential Problem of Evil and the Aesthetics of Surprise

Faith and Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Paul Draper argues that given theism we should not expect the amount of pain and suffering we observe in the world. And since the prevalence of such evils is not surprising from a non-theistic perspective, we should reject the theistic hypothesis. But not all surprising observations are necessarily a demerit when it comes to the assessment of a given theoretical perspective. I propose that on Christian theism the prevalence of evil is a surprising feature that contributes to the overall aesthetic merit of the theistic hypothesis. This element of surprise in the world, when considered as a divine drama, sets the stage for an even more surprising dramatic upswing where the work of God solves the central narrative riddle of human history, namely evil and how it can be conquered.

Author's Profile

James S. Spiegel
The Kalos Center

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-12

Downloads
206 (#93,938)

6 months
206 (#17,934)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?