Three Arguments for Absolute Outcome Measures

Philosophy of Science 84 (5):840-852 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Data from medical research are typically summarized with various types of outcome measures. We present three arguments in favor of absolute over relative outcome measures. The first argument is from cognitive bias: relative measures promote the reference class fallacy and the overestimation of treatment effectiveness. The second argument is decision-theoretic: absolute measures are superior to relative measures for making a decision between interventions. The third argument is causal: interpreted as measures of causal strength, absolute measures satisfy a set of desirable properties, but relative measures do not. Absolute outcome measures outperform relative measures on all counts.

Author Profiles

Jacob Stegenga
Cambridge University
Jan Sprenger
University of Turin


Added to PP

383 (#30,385)

6 months
62 (#30,532)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?