A Kantian Response to Bolzano’s Critique of Kant’s Analytic-Synthetic Distinction

Grazer Philosophische Studien 85 (1):33-61 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of Bolzano’s objections to Kant’s way of drawing the analytic-synthetic distinction is that it only applies to judgments within a narrow range of syntactic forms, namely, universal affirmative judgments. According to Bolzano, Kant cannot account for judgments of other syntactic forms that, intuitively, are analytic. A recent paper by Ian Proops also attributes to Kant the view that analytic judgments beyond a limited range of syntactic forms are impossible. I argue that, correctly understood, Kant’s conception of analyticity allows for analytic judgments of a wider range of syntactic forms.

Author's Profile

Nicholas Stang
University of Toronto, St. George

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-17

Downloads
755 (#20,020)

6 months
105 (#41,555)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?