Hypothetical Consent and Justification

Journal of Philosophy 97 (6):313 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Hypothetical contracts have been said to be not worth the paper they are not written on. This paper defends hypothetical consent theories of justice, such as Rawls's, against the view that they lack justificatory power. I argue that while hypothetical consent cannot generate political obligation, it can generate political legitimacy.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-04-01
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
520 ( #14,580 of 71,243 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #14,797 of 71,243 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.