Modality And What Is Said

Noûs 36 (s16):321-344 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
If, relative to a context, what a sentence says is necessarily true, then what it says must be so. If, relative to a context, what a sentence says is possible, then what it says could be true. Following natural philosophical usage, it would thus seem clear that in assessing an occurrence of a sentence for possibility or necessity, one is assessing what is said by that occurrence. In this paper, I argue that natural philosophical usage misleads here. In assessing an occurrence of a sentence for possibility or necessity, one is not assessing the modal status of the proposition expressed by that occurrence of the sentence.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2003
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STAMAW-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
438 ( #7,555 of 43,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #36,218 of 43,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.