Robust evidence and secure evidence claims

Philosophy of Science 71 (4):467-488 (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many philosophers have claimed that evidence for a theory is better when multiple independent tests yield the same result, i.e., when experimental results are robust. Little has been said about the grounds on which such a claim rests, however. The present essay presents an analysis of the evidential value of robustness that rests on the fallibility of assumptions about the reliability of testing procedures and a distinction between the strength of evidence and the security of an evidence claim. Robustness can enhance the security of an evidence claim either by providing what I call second-order evidence, or by providing back-up evidence for a hypothesis.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STAREA
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-08-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Book of Evidence.Achinstein, Peter

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 32 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
597 ( #5,385 of 45,590 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #16,747 of 45,590 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.