Is risk aversion irrational? Examining the “fallacy” of large numbers

Synthese 197 (10):4425-4437 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A moderately risk averse person may turn down a 50/50 gamble that either results in her winning $200 or losing $100. Such behaviour seems rational if, for instance, the pain of losing $100 is felt more strongly than the joy of winning $200. The aim of this paper is to examine an influential argument that some have interpreted as showing that such moderate risk aversion is irrational. After presenting an axiomatic argument that I take to be the strongest case for the claim that moderate risk aversion is irrational, I show that it essentially depends on an assumption that those who think that risk aversion can be rational should be skeptical of. Hence, I conclude that risk aversion need not be irrational.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STEIRA-7
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-08-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-08-28

Total views
586 ( #10,029 of 2,449,040 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #8,986 of 2,449,040 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.