Mathematical Knowledge and Naturalism

Philosophia 47 (1):225-247 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
How should one conceive of the method of mathematics, if one takes a naturalist stance? Mathematical knowledge is regarded as the paradigm of certain knowledge, since mathematics is based on the axiomatic method. Natural science is deeply mathematized, and science is crucial for any naturalist perspective. But mathematics seems to provide a counterexample both to methodological and ontological naturalism. To face this problem, some naturalists try to naturalize mathematics relying on Darwinism. But several difficulties arise when one tries to naturalize in this way the traditional view of mathematics, according to which mathematical knowledge is certain and the method of mathematics is the axiomatic method. This paper suggests that, in order to naturalize mathematics through Darwinism, it is better to take the method of mathematics not to be the axiomatic method.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-08-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

View all 72 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
139 ( #27,188 of 48,987 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #13,912 of 48,987 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.