# Mathematical Knowledge, the Analytic Method, and Naturalism

In Sorin Bangu (ed.),

*Naturalizing Logico-Mathematical Knowledge. Approaches from Philosophy, Psychology and Cognitive Science*. New York, Stati Uniti: pp. 268-293 (2018)**Abstract**

This chapter tries to answer the following question: How should we conceive of the method of mathematics, if we take a naturalist stance? The problem arises since mathematical knowledge is regarded as the paradigm of certain knowledge, because mathematics is based on the axiomatic method. Moreover, natural science is deeply mathematized, and science is crucial for any naturalist perspective. But mathematics seems to provide a counterexample both to methodological and ontological naturalism. To face this problem, some authors tried to naturalize mathematics by relying on evolutionism. But several difficulties arise when we try to do this. This chapter suggests that, in order to naturalize mathematics, it is better to take the method of mathematics to be the analytic method, rather than the axiomatic method, and thus conceive of mathematical knowledge as plausible knowledge.

**Categories**

(categorize this paper)

**PhilPapers/Archive ID**

STEMKT

**Revision history**

References found in this work BETA

Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives.Stanford, P. Kyle

Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

Realism, Mathematics and Modality.Field, Hartry

View all 75 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mathematical Knowledge and Naturalism.Sterpetti, Fabio

**Added to PP index**

2018-08-06

**Total views**

162 ( #24,656 of 49,048 )

**Recent downloads (6 months)**

37 ( #18,876 of 49,048 )

How can I increase my downloads?

**Downloads since first upload**

*This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.*