Moving Past the Systematics Wars

Journal of the History of Biology 51 (1):31-67 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is time to escape the constraints of the Systematics Wars narrative and pursue new questions that are better positioned to establish the relevance of the field in this time period to broader issues in the history of biology and history of science. To date, the underlying assumptions of the Systematics Wars narrative have led historians to prioritize theory over practice and the conflicts of a few leading theorists over the less-polarized interactions of systematists at large. We show how shifting to a practice-oriented view of methodology, centered on the trajectory of mathematization in systematics, demonstrates problems with the common view that one camp straightforwardly “won” over the other. In particular, we critique David Hull’s historical account in Science as a Process by demonstrating exactly the sort of intermediate level of positive sharing between phenetic and cladistic theories that undermines their mutually exclusive individuality as conceptual systems over time. It is misleading, or at least inadequate, to treat them simply as holistically opposed theories that can only interact by competition to the death. Looking to the future, we suggest that the concept of workflow provides an important new perspective on the history of mathematization and computerization in biology after World War II.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STEMPT-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-02-02

Total views
24 ( #34,880 of 38,910 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #32,372 of 38,910 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.