On Mizrahi’s Argument Against Stanford’s Instrumentalism

Axiomathes 29 (2):103-125 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Mizrahi’s argument against Stanford’s challenge to scientific realism is analyzed. Mizrahi’s argument is worth of attention for at least two reasons: unlike other criticisms that have been made to Stanford’s view so far, Mizrahi’s argument does not question any specific claim of Stanford’s argument, rather it puts into question the very coherence of Stanford’s position, because it argues that since Stanford’s argument rests on the problem of the unconceived alternatives, Stanford’s argument is self-defeating. Thus, if Mizrahi’s argument is effective in countering Stanford’s view, it may be able to question the validity of other philosophical positions which similarly rest on the problem of the unconceived alternatives; Mizrahi’s argument against Stanford’s view is in part based on the development of a Stanford-like argument for the field of philosophy. This makes Mizrahi’s argument potentially relevant to the metaphilosophical debate. After careful examination, Mizrahi’s argument against Stanford’s instrumentalism is found wanting. Moreover, a Stanford-like argument is developed, which aims at challenging the metaphilosophical stance implied by Mizrahi’s argument against Stanford’s instrumentalism.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STEOMA-7
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-08-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Laws and Symmetry.van Fraassen, Bas C.
The Scientific Image.Van Fraassen, Bas C.
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-08-01

Total views
76 ( #29,328 of 42,199 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #22,128 of 42,199 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.