Symbols, Signals, and the Archaeological Record

Biological Theory 9 (1):1-3 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The articles in this issue represent the pursuit of a new understanding of the human past, one that can replace the neo-saltationist view of a human revolution with models that can account for the complexities of the archaeological record and of human social lives. The articulation of archaeological, philosophical, and biological perspectives seems to offer a strong foundation for exploring available evidence, and this was the rationale for collecting these particular articles. Even at this preliminary stage there is a coherence emerging in proposals: the origin and operation of symbolically rich, complexly signaling human social systems was the consequence of the long-term evolution of multiple components of perceiving and negotiating social interactions, a contingent outcome of myriad adaptive shifts rather than a single event.

Author Profiles

Kim Sterelny
Australian National University
Peter Hiscock
University of Sydney

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
593 (#26,049)

6 months
97 (#40,334)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?