The neurobiology of addiction: implications for voluntary control of behavior

American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):8-11 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There continues to be a debate on whether addiction is best understood as a brain disease or a moral condition. This debate, which may influence both the stigma attached to addiction and access to treatment, is often motivated by the question of whether and to what extent we can justly hold addicted individuals responsible for their actions. In fact, there is substantial evidence for a disease model, but the disease model per se does not resolve the question of voluntary control. Recent research at the intersection of neuroscience and psychology suggests that addicted individuals have substantial impairments in cognitive control of behavior, but this “loss of control” is not complete or simple. Possible mechanisms and implications are briefly reviewed.

Author's Profile

Steven Edward Hyman
Harvard University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-13

Downloads
1,727 (#5,499)

6 months
453 (#3,734)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?