Why "We" Are Not Harming the Global Poor: A Critique of Pogge's Leap from State to Individual Responsibility

Public Reason 4 (1-2):119-138 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Thomas Pogge claims "that, by shaping and enforcing the social conditions that foreseeably and avoidably cause the monumental suffering of global poverty, we are harming the global poor ... or, to put it more descriptively, we are active participants in the largest, though not the gravest, crime against humanity ever committed." In other words, he claims that by upholding certain international arrangements we are violating our strong negative duties not to harm, and not just some positive duties to help. I shall argue that even if Pogge were correct in claiming that certain rich states or at least the rich states collectively violate certain negative duties towards the poor and harm the poor, he is far too hasty in concluding that "we," the citizens of those states, are thus harming the global poor or violating our negative duties towards them. In fact, his conclusion can be shown to be wrong not least of all in the light of some of his own assumptions about collective responsibility, the enforceability of human rights, and terrorism. In addition, I will also argue that his view that we share responsibility for the acts of our political "representatives," who allegedly act "on our behalf," is unwarranted
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STEWWA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-01-15

Total views
748 ( #7,775 of 65,600 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #31,104 of 65,600 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.