Why We Shouldn’t Reject Conflicts: A Critique of Tadros

Res Publica 20 (3):315-322 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Victor Tadros thinks the idea that in a conflict both sides may permissibly use force should (typically) be rejected. Thus, he thinks that two shipwrecked persons should not fight for the only available flotsam (which can only carry one person) but instead toss a coin, and that a bomber justifiably attacking an ammunitions factory must not be counterattacked by the innocent bystanders he endangers. I shall argue that Tadros’s claim rests on unwarranted assumptions and is also mistaken in the light of the moral reasoning that he himself offers in support of his ‘means principle’
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STEWWS
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-01-19

Total views
298 ( #12,395 of 44,318 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #11,999 of 44,318 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.