Abstract

In a selected case study, set in the beginnings of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, I will look at accusations of inner-scientific science denialism as reactions to claims to scientific consensus positions. In the case, I am scrutinizing a claim of scientific consensus by the WHO, which culminated in a public and – to this day – unrevised Tweet (as of Oct. 1st, 2022). Their positioning can merely be partially distinguished from inner-scientific science denialism. Scientific consensus may only be claimed, if there indeed is one. Even the claim of scientific consensus must not inhibit critical vetting. And, falsely claimed consensus positions ought to be revised in a Lakatosian step forward.